Speed Insights
Incomplete capture
Missing LCP, TBT, CLS
https://pilot-shell.com
LCP
N/A
Largest paint
TBT
N/A
Blocking time
CLS
N/A
Layout shift
76
out of 100
91
out of 100
104/114 rule points
75
out of 100
57/76 rule points
72
out of 100
68/94 rule points
64
out of 100
70/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
Remove exposed sensitive files
Why this needs attention
A small public allowlist probe found a sensitive-looking file path.
Publicly exposed config or backup files can leak implementation details or secrets.
Recommended correction
Evidence
A small allowlist probe returned a public success response.
Priority
Priority 1: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Fix rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 3 violation rule(s), including 2 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: color-contrast (3), scrollable-region-focusable (1), landmark-contentinfo-is-top-level (1).
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Make the primary CTA obvious
Why this needs attention
The page does not have a detectable call to action.
Early visitors need a clear next step, such as trying the product, joining a waitlist, or booking a demo.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 CTA candidate(s).
Priority
Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Add a useful meta description
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose a strong short summary for search and answer engines.
A missing description makes previews weaker when early users share or find the page.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Meta description is 189 characters.
Priority
Priority 3: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Add common public security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 4 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security, content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, referrer-policy. Missing: x-frame-options.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
Meta description
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose a strong short summary for search and answer engines.
A missing description makes previews weaker when early users share or find the page.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Meta description is 189 characters. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 3: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Common security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 4 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security, content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, referrer-policy. Missing: x-frame-options. Failed: earned 15 of 18 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Sensitive file probes
Why this needs attention
A small public allowlist probe found a sensitive-looking file path.
Publicly exposed config or backup files can leak implementation details or secrets.
Recommended correction
Evidence
A small allowlist probe returned a public success response. Failed: earned 0 of 16 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 1: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Basic contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
25 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 1. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 3 violation rule(s), including 2 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: color-contrast (3), scrollable-region-focusable (1), landmark-contentinfo-is-top-level (1). Failed: earned 0 of 18 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Visible primary CTA
Why this needs attention
The page does not have a detectable call to action.
Early visitors need a clear next step, such as trying the product, joining a waitlist, or booking a demo.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 CTA candidate(s). Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Trust signals
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose detectable proof, customer, review, security, or credibility signals.
Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s). Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Spacing consistency
Why this needs attention
The page exposes few consistent spacing signals in class or inline styles.
Consistent spacing helps the page feel deliberate and easier to scan.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 spacing class/style signal(s). Failed: earned 0 of 7 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 25: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 22. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
