Speed Insights
Grade A
100% performance
https://financialmodels.com.au
From Financialmodels.com.au
LCP
328ms
Largest paint
TBT
0ms
Blocking time
CLS
0.000
Layout shift
75
out of 100
93
out of 100
139/150 rule points
81
out of 100
58/72 rule points
39
out of 100
31/80 rule points
87
out of 100
96/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
For your AI agent
Share this audit’s URL with ChatGPT, Claude, or your coding agent to turn findings into fixes. Your agent can open the saved evidence below when it needs more detail; these files never start a new scan.
Agent-readable files
Add common public security headers
Why this needs attention
Several browser protection headers are missing or present only as weak, narrow policies.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 of 5 common public security controls. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, frame protection (x-frame-options or content-security-policy frame-ancestors), referrer-policy. Needs strengthening: none.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Label public form fields
Why this needs attention
Some form controls do not have a detectable label or accessible name.
Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected labels or accessible names for 1 of 2 eligible user-facing form control(s).
Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Fix rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 4 violation rule(s); 3 non-contrast rule(s) are scored here, including 0 serious or critical rule(s). Color contrast is scored once by the dedicated contrast check. 2 result(s) require review. Top rules: color-contrast (6), heading-order (2), landmark-one-main (1), region (63).
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Affected elements
AUD
AUD
AUD
Heading levels should only increase by one
Fix any of the following: Heading order invalid
Fix Prompt
Strengthen answer-engine content quality
Why this needs attention
The page is technically discoverable, but its entity clarity, answer-ready copy, structured data, evidence, authorship, or freshness is not yet complete.
Search and answer systems need clear, extractable, verifiable facts in addition to crawl access and metadata.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Role-aware AEO content components: entity clarity 100/100, answer-ready text 90/100, semantic structured data 80/100. Detected role: home (high confidence).
Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Fix heading order
Why this needs attention
Heading levels appear to jump or start without a clear hierarchy.
A clean heading outline helps visitors scan the page and helps assistive technology navigate it.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Heading levels found: 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 8 high, 3 medium, 1 low. Coverage: 0 review and 1 not applicable.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Coverage: 0 review and 1 not applicable.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 0 low. Coverage: 0 review and 2 not applicable.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low. Coverage: 0 review and 0 not applicable.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 8 high, 3 medium, 1 low. Coverage: 0 review and 1 not applicable.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 0 low. Coverage: 0 review and 2 not applicable.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Coverage: 0 review and 1 not applicable.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low. Coverage: 0 review and 0 not applicable.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
Answer-engine content quality
Why this needs attention
The page is technically discoverable, but its entity clarity, answer-ready copy, structured data, evidence, authorship, or freshness is not yet complete.
Search and answer systems need clear, extractable, verifiable facts in addition to crawl access and metadata.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Role-aware AEO content components: entity clarity 100/100, answer-ready text 90/100, semantic structured data 80/100. Detected role: home (high confidence). Failed: earned 37 of 40 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Heading structure
Why this needs attention
The page heading structure is either missing a single main heading or skips heading levels.
Clear headings help visitors, search engines, and assistive technology understand the page quickly.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 H1 heading(s) and 25 total headings. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 9: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Common security headers
Why this needs attention
Several browser protection headers are missing or present only as weak, narrow policies.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 of 5 common public security controls. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, frame protection (x-frame-options or content-security-policy frame-ancestors), referrer-policy. Needs strengthening: none. Failed: earned 4 of 18 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Form labels
Why this needs attention
Some form controls do not have a detectable label or accessible name.
Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected labels or accessible names for 1 of 2 eligible user-facing form control(s). Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Heading order
Why this needs attention
Heading levels appear to jump or start without a clear hierarchy.
A clean heading outline helps visitors scan the page and helps assistive technology navigate it.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Heading levels found: 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5. Failed: earned 0 of 11 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Landmark presence
Why this needs attention
The page is missing common landmarks such as header, nav, main, or footer.
Landmarks make the page easier to navigate for assistive technology and keyboard users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 main landmark(s) and 3 total landmark element(s) or roles. A page should expose one main landmark. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 18: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Basic contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
8 of 202 rendered text color sample(s) across captured viewports missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 4.01. Mobile 390px viewport: 8 of 202 failed; worst ratio 4.01:1. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Affected elements
AUD
AUD
AUD
AUD
Fix Prompt
Rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 4 violation rule(s); 3 non-contrast rule(s) are scored here, including 0 serious or critical rule(s). Color contrast is scored once by the dedicated contrast check. 2 result(s) require review. Top rules: color-contrast (6), heading-order (2), landmark-one-main (1), region (63). Failed: earned 12 of 18 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Affected elements
AUD
AUD
AUD
Heading levels should only increase by one
Fix any of the following: Heading order invalid
Fix Prompt
Credibility and proof
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose enough verifiable credibility for its detected role.
Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 commercial proof signal(s) and 0 source or methodology signal(s) for this home page. Failed: earned 5 of 10 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Desktop horizontal overflow: 0px. Mobile horizontal overflow at 390px: 3px. WCAG 2.2 AA target-size failures: 0. Targets smaller than 24×24px pass only when the required spacing or another WCAG exception applies. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Affected elements
Editable Word & Excel
Australian business plan standards Editable Word & Excel what-if risk testing 5-year financial forec
Australian business plan standards
22 separate files Browse Template Pack
Fix Prompt
Page-level AEO readiness
Shared eligibility and content signals that affect every search and answer agent.
Index and citation eligibility
No general noindex directive was detected.
Snippet and answer controls
No general nosnippet or max-snippet:0 control was detected.
Canonical alignment
The canonical resolves to the scanned public URL.
Sitemap coverage and freshness
The exact URL appears in the fetched sitemap with lastmod 2026-06-14.
Structured data
Semantic schema score 80/100. Detected 5 JSON-LD block(s), 0 parse error(s), 8 graph node(s), and types Country, Organization, PostalAddress, SearchAction, WebPage, WebSite. The schema type matches the detected page role. The primary schema entity was not clearly supported by visible page content.
Public or paywalled content
No isAccessibleForFree structured-data value was detected.
Entity clarity
Entity alignment scored 100/100 for “Business plans,built properly.”. Title/H1 token overlap is 100%; description match detected; identity schema detected.
Answer-ready visible text
Answerability scored 90/100 from 924 main-content words, 14 concise answer block(s), 1 question heading(s), 8 definition(s), 7 list(s), and 0 table(s).
Authorship and accountability
Authorship is not a universal requirement for the detected home page role.
Published or updated date
Freshness metadata is contextual for the detected home page role.
Supporting-source links
Supporting sources are contextual for the detected home page role and do not affect readiness.
Rendered content availability
Rendered audit completed with 0 visible text element(s).
Synthetic search-agent reachability
8 of 8 completed search/discovery User-Agent probes returned reachable content.
Optional LLM-readable summary
No llms.txt file was found; this is optional and does not reduce core AEO readiness.
OpenAIChatGPT searchOAI-SearchBotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
AI search
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
OpenAIOpenAI model trainingGPTBotPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Model training
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
OpenAIChatGPT user fetchesChatGPT-UserUNKNOWN · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: not applicable to user-requested fetches
Synthetic probe: not tested · access is unverified
AnthropicClaude model trainingClaudeBotPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Model training
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
AnthropicClaude searchClaude-SearchBotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
AI search
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
AnthropicClaude user fetchesClaude-UserPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
GoogleGoogle Search and AI featuresGooglebotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Search and discovery
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
GoogleGemini data use and groundingGoogle-ExtendedPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Data-use policy control
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
MicrosoftBing and CopilotBingbotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Search and discovery
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
PerplexityPerplexity searchPerplexityBotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
AI search
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
PerplexityPerplexity user fetchesPerplexity-UserUNKNOWN · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: not applicable to user-requested fetches
Synthetic probe: not tested · access is unverified
AppleSiri, Spotlight, and Safari searchApplebotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Search and discovery
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
AppleApple foundation-model trainingApplebot-ExtendedPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Data-use policy control
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
Mistral AIMistral searchMistralAI-IndexPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
AI search
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
Mistral AIMistral user fetchesMistralAI-UserPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
MetaMeta AI model and product datameta-externalagentPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Model training
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
MetaMeta AI user fetchesmeta-externalfetcherPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
AmazonAmazon model trainingAmazonbotPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Model training
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
AmazonAlexa and Rufus searchAmzn-SearchBotPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
AI search
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
AmazonAlexa user fetchesAmzn-UserPASS · ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
User-requested fetch
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: reachable · HTTP 200 · 100% sampled-content parity
Common CrawlOpen web datasetsCCBotPOLICY ALLOWED · Toggle crawler details
Model training
Robots: allowed by * allow: / · line 2
Synthetic probe: not applicable to this policy control
Ready combines robots policy, a bounded synthetic User-Agent fetch, indexability, and snippet eligibility. Synthetic probes do not prove vendor-origin traffic. Preference states are training or data-use choices and do not lower the AEO score.
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
