Speed Insights
Incomplete capture
Missing LCP, TBT, CLS
https://affiliationlist.com
LCP
N/A
Largest paint
TBT
N/A
Blocking time
CLS
N/A
Layout shift
87
out of 100
96
out of 100
110/114 rule points
87
out of 100
66/76 rule points
81
out of 100
76/94 rule points
83
out of 100
91/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
Add common public security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 3 of 5 common public security headers. Present: x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy. Missing: strict-transport-security, content-security-policy.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Fix rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 45.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Use semantic buttons and links
Why this needs attention
Interactive controls are not consistently represented as semantic buttons or links.
Non-semantic controls can be hard to use with keyboards and screen readers.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 2 semantic control(s) out of 3.
Priority
Priority 17: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Add trust signals
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose detectable proof, customer, review, security, or credibility signals.
Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s).
Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Improve detectable color contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
6 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 3.8.
Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
LLM-readable file
Why this needs attention
The scan did not find llms.txt or .well-known/llms.txt.
A short LLM-readable file can help answer engines and AI tools summarize your product accurately.
Recommended correction
Evidence
HTTP 404 returned for llms_txt. Failed: earned 0 of 4 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 24: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Common security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 3 of 5 common public security headers. Present: x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy. Missing: strict-transport-security, content-security-policy. Failed: earned 8 of 18 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Semantic buttons and links
Why this needs attention
Interactive controls are not consistently represented as semantic buttons or links.
Non-semantic controls can be hard to use with keyboards and screen readers.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 2 semantic control(s) out of 3. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 17: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Basic contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
6 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 3.8. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Trust signals
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose detectable proof, customer, review, security, or credibility signals.
Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s). Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 45. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
