Direct answer
What this audit tells you
A website accessibility checker can find many repeatable public-page defects, including missing names, weak structure, contrast failures, and rendered rule violations. It cannot replace keyboard, screen-reader, zoom, content, and user testing, so FreeScan presents the result as diagnostic evidence rather than certification.
What you receive
One report, three practical outcomes
Content alternatives
Find images without useful alternative text and forms without detectable labels.
Document structure
Review heading order, language, landmarks, and semantic interactive controls.
Rendered barriers
Use browser-computed contrast evidence and axe-core results tied to affected elements.
Workflow
Use the evidence before changing the website
Step 1
Fix severe automated failures
Resolve critical and serious names, roles, labels, contrast, and structure issues first.
Step 2
Test the complete task
Use a keyboard, zoom, and representative assistive technology to evaluate real interaction behavior.
Step 3
Retest after deployment
Confirm the public DOM and styles changed without breaking focus, semantics, or responsive behavior.
Methodology
Review the checks behind this audit
Related audits
Follow the subject-specific path
Limits
What this public audit does not claim
- Automated checks cover only part of WCAG and cannot establish legal compliance.
- Passing automated checks does not prove that a complete workflow works with assistive technology.
- Manual review remains necessary for focus order, keyboard behavior, screen-reader meaning, and content clarity.
Check the current public page
Run the deterministic scan, inspect the evidence, and keep the existing page unchanged until a finding is reproduced.
Start a free audit
