Speed Insights
Incomplete capture
Missing LCP, TBT, CLS
https://www.tinylayers.pro
From https://tinylayers.pro/
LCP
N/A
Largest paint
TBT
N/A
Blocking time
CLS
N/A
Layout shift
95
out of 100
96
out of 100
110/114 rule points
100
out of 100
76/76 rule points
100
out of 100
94/94 rule points
85
out of 100
94/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
Fix rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 11.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Make spacing more consistent
Why this needs attention
The page exposes few consistent spacing signals in class or inline styles.
Consistent spacing helps the page feel deliberate and easier to scan.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 spacing class/style signal(s).
Priority
Priority 25: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Add an LLM-readable product file
Why this needs attention
The scan did not find llms.txt or .well-known/llms.txt.
A short LLM-readable file can help answer engines and AI tools summarize your product accurately.
Recommended correction
Evidence
HTTP 404 returned for llms_txt.
Priority
Priority 24: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
No failed checks in this category.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
No failed checks in this category.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
No failed checks in this category.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
No failed checks in this category.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
LLM-readable file
Why this needs attention
The scan did not find llms.txt or .well-known/llms.txt.
A short LLM-readable file can help answer engines and AI tools summarize your product accurately.
Recommended correction
Evidence
HTTP 404 returned for llms_txt. Failed: earned 0 of 4 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 24: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Spacing consistency
Why this needs attention
The page exposes few consistent spacing signals in class or inline styles.
Consistent spacing helps the page feel deliberate and easier to scan.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 spacing class/style signal(s). Failed: earned 0 of 7 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 25: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 11. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
