Speed Insights
Incomplete capture
Missing LCP, TBT, CLS
https://livingpage.app
LCP
N/A
Largest paint
TBT
N/A
Blocking time
CLS
N/A
Layout shift
71
out of 100
82
out of 100
94/114 rule points
91
out of 100
69/76 rule points
32
out of 100
30/94 rule points
80
out of 100
88/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
Fix rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 3 violation rule(s), including 1 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: color-contrast (14), landmark-one-main (1), region (66).
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Label public form fields
Why this needs attention
Some form controls do not have a detectable label or accessible name.
Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected labels or accessible names for 0 of 1 form control(s).
Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Clarify the hero promise
Why this needs attention
The hero area does not provide enough clear product context.
Visitors decide quickly whether the product is relevant; a vague hero weakens every acquisition channel.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 2 H1 heading(s) and 154 meta-description characters.
Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Add common public security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 3 of 5 common public security headers. Present: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, referrer-policy. Missing: strict-transport-security, x-frame-options.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Publish a valid sitemap.xml
Why this needs attention
The sitemap file was not reachable or did not look like valid sitemap XML.
A sitemap helps search engines discover the landing page and related public pages sooner.
Recommended correction
Evidence
sitemap.xml returned HTTP success but did not contain a urlset or sitemapindex root.
Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
Heading structure
Why this needs attention
The page heading structure is either missing a single main heading or skips heading levels.
Clear headings help visitors, search engines, and assistive technology understand the page quickly.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 2 H1 heading(s) and 13 total headings. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 9: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
sitemap.xml validity
Why this needs attention
The sitemap file was not reachable or did not look like valid sitemap XML.
A sitemap helps search engines discover the landing page and related public pages sooner.
Recommended correction
Evidence
sitemap.xml returned HTTP success but did not contain a urlset or sitemapindex root. Failed: earned 0 of 12 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Common security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 3 of 5 common public security headers. Present: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, referrer-policy. Missing: strict-transport-security, x-frame-options. Failed: earned 11 of 18 points from partial coverage.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Image alt text
Why this needs attention
One or more images are missing alt text.
People using screen readers may miss product context, trust signals, or calls to action.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 7 image(s) missing alt text out of 53. Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 11: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Form labels
Why this needs attention
Some form controls do not have a detectable label or accessible name.
Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected labels or accessible names for 0 of 1 form control(s). Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Semantic buttons and links
Why this needs attention
Interactive controls are not consistently represented as semantic buttons or links.
Non-semantic controls can be hard to use with keyboards and screen readers.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 semantic control(s) out of 2. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 17: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Basic contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
7 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 1. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 3 violation rule(s), including 1 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: color-contrast (14), landmark-one-main (1), region (66). Failed: earned 0 of 18 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Hero clarity signals
Why this needs attention
The hero area does not provide enough clear product context.
Visitors decide quickly whether the product is relevant; a vague hero weakens every acquisition channel.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 2 H1 heading(s) and 154 meta-description characters. Failed: earned 0 of 13 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 39. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
How FreeScan evaluates this check (opens in a new tab)Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
