Website audit scorecard for listbulb.com
The scanner fetched the public page, extracted deterministic facts, and stored scored results across SEO / AEO, security, accessibility, and design.
Submitted
https://www.listbulb.com/
Final URL
https://www.listbulb.com
Created
Jul 4, 2026, 12:43 PM
Safe fetch
182 ms
73
out of 100
100
out of 100
92/92 rule points
66
out of 100
50/76 rule points
57
out of 100
54/94 rule points
67
out of 100
74/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
axe found 4 violation rule(s), including 3 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: aria-hidden-focus (4), color-contrast (3), link-in-text-block (1), region (2).
Detected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy.
Detected labels or accessible names for 3 of 4 form control(s).
Detected 4 insecure asset or link reference(s).
Add common public security headers
-14 rule ptsWhat failed
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
Evidence
Detected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
How to fix it
Configure headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
Fix rendered axe accessibility violations
-18 rule ptsWhat failed
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
Evidence
axe found 4 violation rule(s), including 3 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: aria-hidden-focus (4), color-contrast (3), link-in-text-block (1), region (2).
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
How to fix it
Fix the top axe rule IDs first, especially critical and serious violations around names, roles, labels, headings, contrast, landmarks, and keyboard-accessible controls.
Remove insecure page resources
-12 rule ptsWhat failed
The page references insecure HTTP assets or links from an HTTPS page.
Evidence
Detected 4 insecure asset or link reference(s).
Priority
Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters
Mixed content can cause browser warnings, broken assets, and lower visitor trust.
How to fix it
Change public asset, link, and form URLs from http:// to https:// where the destination supports it.
Label public form fields
-14 rule ptsWhat failed
Some form controls do not have a detectable label or accessible name.
Evidence
Detected labels or accessible names for 3 of 4 form control(s).
Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters
Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
How to fix it
Connect each input to a visible label or an accurate aria-label/aria-labelledby value.
Fix rendered layout ergonomics
-9 rule ptsWhat failed
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 112.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
How to fix it
Remove elements wider than the viewport, add responsive constraints, and make important links, buttons, inputs, and controls at least 40px tall and wide where possible.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 0 critical, 6 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
No failed checks in this category.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Common security headers
-14 rule ptsDetected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy.
Mixed content indicators
-12 rule ptsDetected 4 insecure asset or link reference(s).
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Rendered axe accessibility violations
-18 rule ptsaxe found 4 violation rule(s), including 3 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: aria-hidden-focus (4), color-contrast (3), link-in-text-block (1), region (2).
Form labels
-14 rule ptsDetected labels or accessible names for 3 of 4 form control(s).
Basic contrast
-8 rule pts11 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 1.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Trust signals
-10 rule ptsDetected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s).
Rendered speed signals
-10 rule ptsDOMContentLoaded: 357ms. Load complete: 991ms. First contentful paint: 576ms. Resources: 89. Scripts: 18. Images: 62. Third-party origins: 60. Transfer: not available.
Rendered layout ergonomics
-9 rule ptsHorizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 112.
Showing failed checks.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
Mixed content indicators
0/12Detected 4 insecure asset or link reference(s).
Failed: earned 0 of 12 points.
Priority: Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters: Mixed content can cause browser warnings, broken assets, and lower visitor trust.
Fix: Change public asset, link, and form URLs from http:// to https:// where the destination supports it.
Common security headers
4/18Detected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy.
Failed: earned 4 of 18 points from partial coverage.
Priority: Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters: These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Fix: Configure headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
Form labels
0/14Detected labels or accessible names for 3 of 4 form control(s).
Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
Priority: Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters: Unlabeled inputs make email capture, demo requests, and signups harder for assistive technology users.
Fix: Connect each input to a visible label or an accurate aria-label/aria-labelledby value.
Basic contrast
0/811 of 100 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 1.
Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
Priority: Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Why it matters: Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Fix: Review key text, buttons, and links against a 4.5:1 contrast target for normal text.
Rendered axe accessibility violations
0/18axe found 4 violation rule(s), including 3 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: aria-hidden-focus (4), color-contrast (3), link-in-text-block (1), region (2).
Failed: earned 0 of 18 points.
Priority: Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Why it matters: axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Fix: Fix the top axe rule IDs first, especially critical and serious violations around names, roles, labels, headings, contrast, landmarks, and keyboard-accessible controls.
Trust signals
0/10Detected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s).
Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority: Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Why it matters: Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Fix: Add honest proof such as customer quotes, usage stats, founder credibility, security notes, or relevant logos.
Rendered speed signals
0/10DOMContentLoaded: 357ms. Load complete: 991ms. First contentful paint: 576ms. Resources: 89. Scripts: 18. Images: 62. Third-party origins: 60. Transfer: not available.
Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority: Priority 14: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters: Slow pages lose impatient visitors and make every SEO, social, and paid-traffic visit work harder.
Fix: Reduce render-blocking scripts/styles, compress and size images, defer non-critical JavaScript, reduce third-party tags, and keep above-the-fold content quick to paint.
Runtime console health
0/7Detected 1 console error(s) and 0 uncaught page error(s) during render.
Failed: earned 0 of 7 points.
Priority: Priority 15: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters: Runtime errors can break forms, CTAs, animations, tracking, or responsive behavior even when the static HTML looks fine.
Fix: Open the page in a browser, reproduce the console errors, and fix missing assets, hydration problems, client-side exceptions, or failing third-party scripts.
Rendered layout ergonomics
0/9Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 112.
Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
Priority: Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Why it matters: Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Fix: Remove elements wider than the viewport, add responsive constraints, and make important links, buttons, inputs, and controls at least 40px tall and wide where possible.
Share preview
listbulb.com website audit report
Close to ready: 73/100 overall, with prioritized fixes for SEO, security, accessibility, and design.
Public reports expose the scanned public URL, safe scores, sanitized public evidence, and fix guidance. They do not include credentials, cookies, hidden form values, or sensitive response bodies.