Speed Insights
Grade N/A
Not captured
https://kotsiossp97.github.io
From Kotsiossp97.github.io
LCP
N/A
Largest paint
TBT
N/A
Blocking time
CLS
N/A
Layout shift
58
out of 100
65
out of 100
74/114 rule points
82
out of 100
62/76 rule points
50
out of 100
47/94 rule points
35
out of 100
38/110 rule points
Category point breakdown
Biggest score-losing checks
Add common public security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Fix rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 6 violation rule(s), including 1 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: button-name (1), landmark-no-duplicate-banner (1), landmark-one-main (1), landmark-unique (1), page-has-heading-one (1).
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Make the primary CTA obvious
Why this needs attention
The page does not have a detectable call to action.
Early visitors need a clear next step, such as trying the product, joining a waitlist, or booking a demo.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 CTA candidate(s).
Priority
Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Add a useful meta description
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose a strong short summary for search and answer engines.
A missing description makes previews weaker when early users share or find the page.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Meta description is 199 characters.
Priority
Priority 3: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Clarify the hero promise
Why this needs attention
The hero area does not provide enough clear product context.
Visitors decide quickly whether the product is relevant; a vague hero weakens every acquisition channel.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 H1 heading(s) and 199 meta-description characters.
Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
SEO / AEO
Severity mix: 1 critical, 7 high, 3 medium, 2 low.
Accessibility
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium, 0 low.
Security
Severity mix: 2 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
Design
Severity mix: 0 critical, 3 high, 6 medium, 2 low.
Failed checks
These checks need attention.
Meta description
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose a strong short summary for search and answer engines.
A missing description makes previews weaker when early users share or find the page.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Meta description is 199 characters. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority
Priority 3: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Heading structure
Why this needs attention
The page heading structure is either missing a single main heading or skips heading levels.
Clear headings help visitors, search engines, and assistive technology understand the page quickly.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 H1 heading(s) and 0 total headings. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
Priority
Priority 9: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
sitemap.xml validity
Why this needs attention
The sitemap file was not reachable or did not look like valid sitemap XML.
A sitemap helps search engines discover the landing page and related public pages sooner.
Recommended correction
Evidence
HTTP 404 returned for sitemap_xml. Failed: earned 0 of 12 points.
Priority
Priority 7: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
LLM-readable file
Why this needs attention
The scan did not find llms.txt or .well-known/llms.txt.
A short LLM-readable file can help answer engines and AI tools summarize your product accurately.
Recommended correction
Evidence
HTTP 404 returned for llms_txt. Failed: earned 0 of 4 points.
Priority
Priority 24: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Internal link basics
Why this needs attention
The page has too few detectable links to other public pages on the same site.
Internal links help visitors find pricing, docs, contact, legal, or product details without getting stuck.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 internal link(s). Failed: earned 0 of 6 points.
Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Common security headers
Why this needs attention
Several basic browser protection headers were not visible.
These headers reduce avoidable browser-side risk and show a baseline of care before launch.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 1 of 5 common public security headers. Present: strict-transport-security. Missing: content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, x-frame-options, referrer-policy. Failed: earned 4 of 18 points from partial coverage.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Heading order
Why this needs attention
Heading levels appear to jump or start without a clear hierarchy.
A clean heading outline helps visitors scan the page and helps assistive technology navigate it.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Heading levels found: none. Failed: earned 0 of 11 points.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Landmark presence
Why this needs attention
The page is missing common landmarks such as header, nav, main, or footer.
Landmarks make the page easier to navigate for assistive technology and keyboard users.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 landmark element(s) or roles. Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority
Priority 18: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Basic contrast
Why this needs attention
The scanner found text/background color pairs that may be hard to read, or could not verify contrast.
Low contrast makes a launch page feel less polished and can exclude users with low vision.
Recommended correction
Evidence
4 of 22 rendered text color sample(s) missed WCAG contrast targets. Worst rendered ratio: 1.12. Failed: earned 0 of 8 points.
Priority
Priority 20: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Rendered axe accessibility violations
Why this needs attention
The rendered page has accessibility rule violations detected by axe-core.
axe checks the actual browser-rendered page, so these issues can affect people using keyboards, screen readers, or other assistive technology.
Recommended correction
Evidence
axe found 6 violation rule(s), including 1 serious or critical rule(s). Top rules: button-name (1), landmark-no-duplicate-banner (1), landmark-one-main (1), landmark-unique (1), page-has-heading-one (1). Failed: earned 0 of 18 points.
Priority
Priority 5: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Visible primary CTA
Why this needs attention
The page does not have a detectable call to action.
Early visitors need a clear next step, such as trying the product, joining a waitlist, or booking a demo.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 CTA candidate(s). Failed: earned 0 of 14 points.
Priority
Priority 4: fix before sharing the page publicly.
Fix Prompt
Hero clarity signals
Why this needs attention
The hero area does not provide enough clear product context.
Visitors decide quickly whether the product is relevant; a vague hero weakens every acquisition channel.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 H1 heading(s) and 199 meta-description characters. Failed: earned 0 of 13 points.
Priority
Priority 6: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Text density
Why this needs attention
The page has too little or too much detectable text for a useful launch page.
Too little copy can leave visitors confused; too much copy can bury the value proposition.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected about 9 visible word(s). Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority
Priority 21: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Trust signals
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose detectable proof, customer, review, security, or credibility signals.
Trust signals reduce hesitation when strangers see the product for the first time.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 trust-signal keyword occurrence(s). Failed: earned 0 of 10 points.
Priority
Priority 16: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Spacing consistency
Why this needs attention
The page exposes few consistent spacing signals in class or inline styles.
Consistent spacing helps the page feel deliberate and easier to scan.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 spacing class/style signal(s). Failed: earned 0 of 7 points.
Priority
Priority 25: lower-risk cleanup after urgent launch blockers.
Fix Prompt
Visual hierarchy
Why this needs attention
The page does not expose enough hierarchy signals from headings, emphasis, or CTA structure.
Hierarchy tells visitors what to read first and what action to take next.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Detected 0 hierarchy signal(s) from headings, CTA, and emphasized text. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
Priority
Priority 12: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
Rendered layout ergonomics
Why this needs attention
The browser-rendered page has layout or tap-target issues.
Horizontal overflow and tiny tap targets make the page feel broken on real devices, especially for mobile visitors.
Recommended correction
Evidence
Horizontal overflow: 0px. Small tap targets: 3. Failed: earned 0 of 9 points.
Priority
Priority 13: fix during launch polish.
Fix Prompt
The image refreshes from FreeScan after a completed rescan. Clicking it always opens the newest public report saved for this exact scanned URL.
Scan evidence is included as untrusted data. The implementation brief instructs agents to verify findings before editing and to avoid destructive or speculative changes.
